Thematic analysis of interviews with academics and students about GenAI and assessment yielded three themes: emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change; and the work and expertise required to change assessment.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with academics and students produced three themes about GenAI and assessment: emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change; and the work and expertise required to change assessment. → Nicola-Richmond 2025
Evidence¶
Nicola-Richmond 2025¶
Nicola-Richmond, K., Dawson, P., Helen, P., & Macfarlane, S. (2025). It takes a village... Program-wide approaches to redesigning assessment in a time of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.53761/zpp2ja61
q2 · i? · qualitative · r?
Qualitative interpretivist study using semi-structured interviews with academics and students about GenAI and assessment; thematic analysis "developed three themes": emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change; and the work and expertise required to change assessment. No effect size is reported.
"A qualitative interpretivist approach was adopted, using semi-structured interviews. When data were thematically analysed, three themes were developed; emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change, and the work and expertise required to change assessment."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Academics and students experienced both positive and negative emotions in relation to GenAI. — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Qualitative themes: efficiency and peer influence drive AI use, while confidence and rule ambiguity shape students' perceptions of dependence — related
- GenAI-era ICT assessment reform requires a whole-of-institution transformation across seven sequential themes — related
- GenAI's immediate answers reduce engineering students' teacher-student interactions for generalizable tasks, while teachers remain preferred for complex problem-solving — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
genai-assessment-three-themes-emotions-role-work |
title |
Thematic analysis of interviews with academics and students about GenAI and assessment yielded three themes: emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change; and the work and expertise required to change assessment. |
description |
Thematic analysis of interviews with academics and students about GenAI and assessment yielded three themes: emotions, academic role and identity; assessment must change; and the work and expertise required to change... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nicola-richmond-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.