GenAI implementation in Global South higher education faces significant barriers including infrastructure, human capital, ethical, policy and contextual challenges¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The reviewed literature identifies significant barriers to GenAI implementation: infrastructure limitations, human capital deficiencies, ethical concerns, inadequate policy frameworks, and contextual challenges. → Nguyen 2026
Evidence¶
Nguyen 2026¶
Nguyen, T. A., & Perkins, M. (2026). Perceptions Of Generative AI in the Global South: A Scoping Review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. https://doi.org/10.53761/f22j6648
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review's synthesis of the 75-paper corpus reports that GenAI "implementation faces significant barriers, including infrastructure limitations, human capital deficiencies, ethical concerns, inadequate policy frameworks, and contextual challenges". No effect sizes are reported; this is a qualitative categorisation of barriers.
"but its implementation faces significant barriers, including infrastructure limitations, human capital deficiencies, ethical concerns, inadequate policy frameworks, and contextual challenges"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- GenAI tools are largely Global North products that have spread rapidly worldwide, including into Global South higher education — related
- Ethical, financial, and infrastructural barriers significantly constrain the long-term sustainability of AI-driven educational transformation in higher education — related
- College leaders identify educator unfamiliarity with GenAI, lack of training infrastructure, and institutional unpreparedness as key challenges — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Academic integrity, professional development, and equity concerns about AI span all surveyed units, though interpreted differently — related
- Institutional barriers to AI integration — ethics concerns, insufficient training, policy gaps, and infrastructure limits — are widespread and co-occurring — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Qualitative findings identified plagiarism, student overreliance on AI, and a barrier of reconciling institutional policy gaps with personal ethical values — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The Global South GenAI literature shows limited geographic representation, stakeholder imbalance, and insufficient exploration of long-term outcomes — related
- GenAI offers transformative possibilities for personalised learning, research support and administrative efficiency in Global South higher education — related
- Multiple trends point to a de-professionalization of teachers in both the North and the South — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
genai-global-south-implementation-barriers |
title |
GenAI implementation in Global South higher education faces significant barriers including infrastructure, human capital, ethical, policy and contextual challenges |
description |
GenAI implementation in Global South higher education faces significant barriers including infrastructure, human capital, ethical, policy and contextual challenges |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nguyen-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.