Nursing students show significant knowledge improvement with GenAI (SMD = 1.11) unlike clinical medicine students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Nursing students demonstrated significant improvement in knowledge exam scores with GenAI (SMD = 1.11, 95%CI 0.54 to 1.69, P = 0.0002, I² = 76%, n = 205). → Xie Guanli 2026
Evidence¶
Xie Guanli 2026¶
Xie Guanli, Liao Jianglong, Tang Xiaoxia, Fu Han, Liu Duo, Deng Li, Wang Tao, Hong Xin. (2026). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on clinical skills and knowledge acquisition in medical undergraduates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09458-3
q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r3
Subgroup meta-analysis of three studies (one quasi-experimental, two RCTs; n = 205 nursing students) pooling knowledge exam scores, showing a large pooled effect (SMD = 1.11) with I² = 76%.
"nursing students demonstrated significant improvement with GenAI compared with the control intervention (P = 0.0002, SMD = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.54 to 1.69, three studies, one quasi-experimental research and two RCTs, n = 205, I2 = 76%, random-effects model)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Nursing students show significant, homogeneous clinical skills benefit from GenAI (SMD = 0.98), and the overall clinical-skills effect differs between majors — related
- GenAI significantly improves academic writing scores for both clinical medicine and nursing students — related
- GenAI does not significantly improve knowledge exam scores of clinical medicine students compared with traditional teaching, with high heterogeneity — related
- GenAI does not significantly improve clinical skills of clinical medicine students compared with traditional teaching — related
- Single studies drive the null findings for knowledge and clinical skills: removing Bhatia 2024 or Briones-Zamora 2026 restores significance — related
- GAI-based teaching and traditional teaching produce comparable knowledge acquisition scores in medical students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.