Primary studies report possible benefits of GenAI for children's divergent thinking, narrative creativity and creative self-efficacy, without confirmed efficacy¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Included primary studies report possible benefits for divergent thinking, narrative creativity, and creative self-efficacy, but heterogeneous designs preclude conclusions about confirmed efficacy. → Niu T 2026

Evidence¶

Niu T 2026¶

Niu T, Liu H, Pang P, Luo YT and Liu T (2026) The role of generative AI in facilitating children's creative thinking and cognitive development: a systematic scoping review. Front. Psychol. 17:1880052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1880052

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's narrative synthesis of 22 primary empirical studies, summarized descriptively without pooling or effect-size estimation. The review reports "possible benefits for divergent thinking, narrative creativity, and creative self-efficacy" while stating that heterogeneous designs and preprints preclude efficacy conclusions.

"The primary studies reported possible benefits for divergent thinking, narrative creativity, and creative self-efficacy, but the heterogeneous designs, absence of formal critical appraisal, and inclusion of preprints preclude conclusions about confirmed efficacy."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Self-Efficacy — outcome: instruction changes it
• Creativity — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Free ChatGPT use boosts originality on the assisted creative task but the advantage disappears when assistance is removed — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
• The evidence base on GenAI and children's creative thinking is dominated by small, short-term, exploratory studies with few controlled comparisons and no longitudinal designs — related
• The review included 24 evidence sources: 22 primary empirical studies and two secondary syntheses used only for contextual interpretation — related
• Recurring benefits of GenAI in STEAM education include engagement, teacher productivity, and creativity when supported by sound pedagogy — related
• Student experiences with GenAI in design thinking fall into four themes: perceived benefits, ethical concerns, hesitance and acceptance, and critical validation — related
• Higher divergent thinking, creative self-efficacy, creative self-concept, and task motivation predict more positive self-assessed creative performance — related
• Individual factors supportive of adolescent creativity include openness to experience, intrinsic motivation, creative self-efficacy, and external attributions for adversity — related
• Self-assessed creative performance correlates moderately with divergent thinking, but self-assessed idea creativity does not — related
• ChatGPT use boosts university students' self-efficacy for task resolution, but self-efficacy barely tracks actual performance — related
• Individual engagement with an educational robot yielded greater divergent-thinking gains than pair work — related