Teachers perceived the ranking of male students to be more accurate than that of female students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Female students received significantly fewer 'yes' ratings and more 'no' ratings than male students, indicating teachers perceived the ranking of male students to be more accurate. → Sun 2026

Evidence¶

Sun 2026¶

Sun, C., Major, L., Daltry, R., Obradovic, L., & Friedberg, A. (2026). Enhancing literacy and numeracy through teacher dashboards and digital personalised learning: an A/B/C test in Kenyan early years education. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10703-1

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Chi-square analysis of the relationship between teacher accuracy ratings and learner gender across the two dashboard partitions. A significant dependence between gender and rating types was found, with male students' rankings perceived as more accurate.

"Female students received significantly fewer “yes” ratings (χ2 (1, N = 15,609) = 6.34, p =.035) and more “no” ratings (χ 2 (1, N = 6,501) = 10.01, p =.005) than male students, indicating that teachers perceived the ranking of male students to be more accurate."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Mind wandering detection is more accurate for female than male learners, with the gender gap larger for temporal models — related
• Teachers rated literacy rankings as more accurate than numeracy rankings — related