Gender-specific prediction patterns: working memory span negatively predicts listening more strongly in males, while its positive bridging influence on English performance is stronger in females¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the male network A4–D3 was strongest (0.20) and A4–D1 was negative (−0.10); in the female network A4 and A3 both predicted D3 at 0.21. → Ma 2023
q2 i? The authors summarise that working memory span's negative listening connection was stronger in males and its bridging influence stronger in females. → Ma 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Ma 2023¶
Ma, C., Song, M., & Zhao, X. (2023). The impact of executive functions on English academic performance among Chinese primary school students: A network analysis. https://www.nwnu.edu.cn
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Gender-stratified network estimation: the male network had 16 non-zero edges (avg. 0.14) with 8 cross-community edges; the female network had 7 non-zero edges (avg. 0.16) with 4 positive cross-community edges, where "A4 and A3 both strongly predict D3(weights=0.21)".
"Figure 3 shows thatA4 has the strongest positive connection to D3 (weight = 0.20), followed by A3 and A5 to D3 (weights = 0.17, 0.15), and A1 to D2 (weight = 0.06). Conversely, A4 negatively predictsD1(weight=−0.10)."
Ma 2023 (2)¶
Ma, C., Song, M., & Zhao, X. (2023). The impact of executive functions on English academic performance among Chinese primary school students: A network analysis. https://www.nwnu.edu.cn
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Authors' summary of the gender comparison results in the Discussion, highlighting "distinct roles of executive function subcomponents in predicting English academic performance across genders".
"working memory span had a stronger negative bridging connection with listening in males, while cognitive flexibility had a greater bridging influence on overall performance in males. Conversely, working memory span's bridging influence was strongerinfemales."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- Working memory span, updating, and cognitive flexibility positively predict English writing, response inhibition positively predicts reading, and working memory span negatively predicts listening — a broader claim this one bears on
- Male and female networks differ in structure and overall connectivity, with tighter internal connections in the male sample — related
- The negative working memory span–listening connection may reflect common-effect structure and overload of listening input rather than a direct detrimental role — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
gender-specific-ef-english-prediction-patterns |
title |
Gender-specific prediction patterns: working memory span negatively predicts listening more strongly in males, while its positive bridging influence on English performance is stronger in females |
description |
Gender-specific prediction patterns: working memory span negatively predicts listening more strongly in males, while its positive bridging influence on English performance is stronger in females |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ma-2023, ma-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.