Claims

Gender-specific prediction patterns: working memory span negatively predicts listening more strongly in males, while its positive bridging influence on English performance is stronger in females

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the male network A4–D3 was strongest (0.20) and A4–D1 was negative (−0.10); in the female network A4 and A3 both predicted D3 at 0.21. → Ma 2023 q2 i? The authors summarise that working memory span's negative listening connection was stronger in males and its bridging influence stronger in females. → Ma 2023 (2)

Evidence

Ma 2023

Ma, C., Song, M., & Zhao, X. (2023). The impact of executive functions on English academic performance among Chinese primary school students: A network analysis. https://www.nwnu.edu.cn

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Gender-stratified network estimation: the male network had 16 non-zero edges (avg. 0.14) with 8 cross-community edges; the female network had 7 non-zero edges (avg. 0.16) with 4 positive cross-community edges, where "A4 and A3 both strongly predict D3(weights=0.21)".

"Figure 3 shows thatA4 has the strongest positive connection to D3 (weight = 0.20), followed by A3 and A5 to D3 (weights = 0.17, 0.15), and A1 to D2 (weight = 0.06). Conversely, A4 negatively predictsD1(weight=−0.10)."

Ma 2023 (2)

Ma, C., Song, M., & Zhao, X. (2023). The impact of executive functions on English academic performance among Chinese primary school students: A network analysis. https://www.nwnu.edu.cn

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Authors' summary of the gender comparison results in the Discussion, highlighting "distinct roles of executive function subcomponents in predicting English academic performance across genders".

"working memory span had a stronger negative bridging connection with listening in males, while cognitive flexibility had a greater bridging influence on overall performance in males. Conversely, working memory span's bridging influence was strongerinfemales."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gender-specific-ef-english-prediction-patterns
title Gender-specific prediction patterns: working memory span negatively predicts listening more strongly in males, while its positive bridging influence on English performance is stronger in females
description Gender-specific prediction patterns: working memory span negatively predicts listening more strongly in males, while its positive bridging influence on English performance is stronger in females
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — ma-2023, ma-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.