Generative AI platforms cannot yet independently lead meaningful innovation; at best they augment human intelligence for innovation¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The article argues there is a long way before AI platforms such as ChatGPT can independently produce meaningful product, process or business model innovation. → Dwivedi 2023

Evidence¶

Dwivedi 2023¶

Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Carter, L., Chowdhury, S., Crick, T., Cunningham, S. W., Davies, G. H., Davison, R. M., Dé, R., Dennehy, D., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Flavián, C., Gauld, R., Grover, V., Hu, M.-C., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Junglas, I., Khorana, S., Kraus, S., Larsen, K. R., Latreille, P., Laumer, S., Malik, F. T., Mardani, A., Mariani, M., Mithas, S., Mogaji, E., Nord, J. H., O'Connor, S., Okumus, F., Pagani, M., Pandey, N., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I. O., Pathak, N., Pries-Heje, J., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Rehm, S.-V., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Richter, A., Rowe, F., Sarker, S., Stahl, B. C., Tiwari, M. K., van der Aalst, W., Venkatesh, V., Viglia, G., Wade, M., Walton, P., Wirtz, J. and Wright, R. (2023) "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Interpretive argument in the innovation-management contribution, reasoning that in complex creative activities a good prompt is not enough for a generative AI system to independently generate a distinctively original product, especially where emotional intelligence is involved.

"there is a long way before AI platforms such as ChatGPT could be capable to lead independently to meaningful product, process, or business model innovation. At best they can help enhance human intelligence for innovation by augmenting human intelligence."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Reviewed literature reports risks of overreliance, AI errors in complex tasks, and students' uncritical acceptance of AI-generated outputs — related
• Perfect AI execution cannot remove four limits: accuracy does not settle end-setting, safety does not confer legitimacy, detection does not secure integrity, and outputs do not replace participation — related
• GenAI feedback limitations require students to exercise evaluative judgement — related
• In the Overview dimension, augmentation produced a marginal QWK decrease (ΔQWK = −0.006) despite improving macro-F1, the only dimension with this trade-off — related
• ChatGPT-generated art lesson plans pose challenges of impracticality, overlooked safety issues, and required teacher revision time — related
• AI is not yet ready to replace teachers but presents a real possibility to augment them — related
• AI solutions can automate routine tasks but cannot yet handle the complex tasks of higher learning — a broader claim this one bears on