Claims

Generative AI chatbots answer orthopaedic exam questions with moderate accuracy, below trainee performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ChatGPT v3.5 answered approximately 45% of upper-extremity exam questions correctly, versus 51–76% for trainees. → Banskota Bibek 2025

Evidence

Banskota Bibek 2025

Banskota Bibek, Bhusal Rajan, Yadav Prkash Kumar, Banskota Ashok Kumar. (2025). Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education, training and research: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08162-y

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports generative AI performance on orthopaedic board-style questions, noting ChatGPT v3.5 achieved approximately 45% accuracy compared with 51–76% for trainees, indicating clinical reasoning that lags behind human trainees.

"ChatGPT v3.5 answered only ~ 45% of upper-extremity exam questions correctly versus 51–76% for trainees"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.