Generative retrieval improves anatomy knowledge retention in anaesthesiology residents at one week and one month¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q4
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? In an RCT, the intervention group scored 90.0% versus 82.0% for the control group at one week (p = 0.012) and 83.0% versus 72.0% at one month (p = 0.026). → Albert Francis A. 2024
Evidence¶
Albert Francis A. 2024¶
Albert Francis A., Seidu Abdul-Aziz, Mason Hannah M., Anderson Emma, Alele Faith O., Heggarty Paula, Hollins Aaron, Gupta Tarun Sen, Hays Richard B., McArthur Lawrie, Malau-Aduli Bunmi S. (2024). A systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8
q4 · i? · review · r3
Randomised controlled trial of a generative retrieval educational intervention in anaesthesiology residents and medical students (N = 30 per Table 1), knowledge tested one week and one month post-intervention; the quoted table row prints p = 0.012 with no effect size.
"1-week post-intervention: The control group score was 82.0% versus 90.0% for the intervention group (p = 0.012)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- QBI students scored significantly higher on weekly formative quizzes than control students, with no difference between the two QBI platforms — related
- Mind mapping significantly improves knowledge retention in neuroanatomy learning versus didactic lecture (Teli et al., 2020) — related
- Flipped classroom instruction is associated with higher final knowledge scores than traditional instruction in medical education (SMD 0.90). — a broader claim this one bears on
- Basic science retention varies by discipline, with anatomy retained best and microbiology lowest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.