Claims

For certain architectural elements, geometric contrast yielded better memory of appearance than stop light colors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Memory of the appearance of certain architectural elements was better with geometric contrast than with stop light colors. → Glaser 2022

Evidence

Glaser 2022

Glaser, M., Lengyel, D., Toulouse, C., & Schwan, S. (2022). How Do We Deal with Uncertain Information? Effects of Verbal and Visual Expressions of Uncertainty on Learning. Educational Psychology Review (2022) 34:1097–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09659-4

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Post-hoc comparison in the results table for the interaction on memory of appearance of certain elements shows "Geometric contrast > stop light colors" with a 95% confidence interval; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Certain: Geometric contrast > stop light colors [0.006 0.300]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id geometric-contrast-better-for-certain-elements
title For certain architectural elements, geometric contrast yielded better memory of appearance than stop light colors
description For certain architectural elements, geometric contrast yielded better memory of appearance than stop light colors
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — glaser-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.