Claims

A dynamic geometry model of the quilt problem helped an informal educator understand its spatial relations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? After email explanation failed, a geometry-software model of the fabric and quilt was reported by the informal educator as very helpful for understanding the spatial relations. → Lili Zhou 2023

Evidence

Lili Zhou 2023

Lili Zhou. (2023). Humanizing Mathematics through Boundary Crossing Collaboration. Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED658339

q1 · i? · qualitative · r2

Identification stage of the narrative inquiry; the informal educator's own report after the researcher built a geometry-software model. She "thought the visual model is very helpful for her to understand the spatial relations". Single participant's perception.

"Laura thought the visual model is very helpful for her to understand the spatial relations."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id geometry-software-model-helped-informal-educator-understand-spatial-relations
title A dynamic geometry model of the quilt problem helped an informal educator understand its spatial relations
description A dynamic geometry model of the quilt problem helped an informal educator understand its spatial relations
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lili-zhou-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.