Claims

High school students used Google page rank as a first-order heuristic for relevance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? When choosing among many possible sources, students frequently applied Google page rank as a proxy for relevance, a first-order strategy adopted uncritically. → Andrea Forte 2015

Evidence

Andrea Forte 2015

Andrea Forte. (2015). The new information literate: Open collaboration and information production in schools. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 10:35–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9210-6

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Qualitative field study of students' search and assessment practices in two high school wiki projects; interview accounts showed students treating top-ranked Google results as "obviously relevant" though none could explain the ranking algorithm.

"When they needed to choose from among many possible sources based on relevance, first-order literacy skills dominated. For example, when confronted with a list of search results, students frequently used Google page rank as a proxy for relevance:"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id google-page-rank-first-order-relevance-heuristic
title High school students used Google page rank as a first-order heuristic for relevance
description High school students used Google page rank as a first-order heuristic for relevance
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — andrea-forte-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.