Claims

GPT-4 exceeds pass marks on India NEET-PG and UK PLAB 1 but falls below pass on clinical reasoning and procedural items

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In five NEET-PG studies GPT-4 averaged 74% accuracy (range 70–80%); across three PLAB studies it exceeded the PLAB 1 pass threshold (72–75%) but fell below equivalent pass marks for clinical communication and procedural reasoning items. → Bodke Parag 2026

Evidence

Bodke Parag 2026

Bodke Parag, Jumle Rahul. (2026). Large language models in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review of examination performance, knowledge acquisition, and learner perceptions. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09999-7

q3 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of five NEET-PG and three PLAB benchmark studies. The review reports "GPT-4 exceeded the PLAB 1 pass threshold in all studies (range: 72%–75%)" and mean NEET-PG accuracy of 74%, described as modestly lower than USMLE performance.

"Across three UK PLAB studies, GPT-4 exceeded the PLAB 1 pass threshold in all studies (range: 72%–75%) while falling below equivalent pass marks for clinical communication and procedural reasoning items"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.