Claims

In grade 7 inclusive classrooms, combined strategy instruction outperformed regular instruction on narrative text comprehension

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Grade 7 experimental group participants who received combined strategy instruction outperformed control counterparts in narrative reading comprehension (F(1,75) = 27.62, P = .00, ŋ2 = .29). → Ghada M. Awada & Mar Gutiérrez-Colón 2017

Evidence

Ghada M. Awada & Mar Gutiérrez-Colón 2017

Ghada M. Awada & Mar Gutiérrez-Colón. (2017). Effect of Inclusion Versus Segregation on Reading Comprehension of EFL Learners with Dyslexia: Case of Lebanon. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 49. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p49

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Three-way ANCOVA of grade 7 post-test narrative comprehension with pre-test covariate, in fully inclusive mixed groups (84 students, 6 with dyslexia). The experimental group "outperformed their control group counterparts" with ŋ2 = .29.

"the experimental group participants who received combined strategy instruction outperformed their control group counterparts in reading comprehension achievement F (1, 75) = 27. 62, P = .00, ŋ2 = .29"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.