Claims

Cognitive constructivism has strong empirical support and suggests new directions for science education, and must be distinguished from metaphysical constructivism

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r? · q1
Currency · newest study 1998 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Grandy argues that claims of cognitive constructivism need to be distinguished from those of metaphysical constructivism, and that cognitive constructivism has strong empirical support and suggests important new directions for science education. → Michael R. Matthews (ed.) 1998

Evidence

Michael R. Matthews (ed.) 1998

Michael R. Matthews (ed.). (1998). Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5032-3

q1 · i? · theoretical · r?

The preface summarizes Grandy's chapter 'Constructivism and Objectivity: Disentangling Metaphysics from Pedagogy'. This is the editor's attribution of Grandy's philosophical argument, not an empirical test reported here.

"He says that the claims of cognitive constructivism need to be distinguished from those of metaphysical constructivism, and that cognitive constructivism has strong empirical support and suggests important new directions for the conduct of science education"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id grandy-cognitive-vs-metaphysical-constructivism
title Cognitive constructivism has strong empirical support and suggests new directions for science education, and must be distinguished from metaphysical constructivism
description Cognitive constructivism has strong empirical support and suggests new directions for science education, and must be distinguished from metaphysical constructivism
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1998
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — michael-r-matthews-ed-1998

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.