Claims

Classroom views of greenery improve children's concentration compared with built views or windowless classrooms

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students randomly assigned to classrooms with views of greenery perform better on concentration tests than students assigned to built views or windowless classrooms. → Kuo M 2019

Evidence

Kuo M 2019

Kuo M, Barnes M and Jordan C (2019) Do Experiences With Nature Promote Learning? Converging Evidence of a Cause-and-Effect Relationship. Front. Psychol. 10:305. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00305

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports an experimental study in which random assignment to classroom views was used; students with "views of greenery perform better on concentration tests" than those with built views or no windows. Attributed to Li and Sullivan (2016).

"Students randomly assigned to classrooms with views of greenery perform better on concentration tests than those assigned to purely "built" views or windowless classrooms (Li and Sullivan, 2016)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id green-classroom-views-boost-concentration
title Classroom views of greenery improve children's concentration compared with built views or windowless classrooms
description Classroom views of greenery improve children's concentration compared with built views or windowless classrooms
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-14
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kuo-m-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.