Claims

Group averages are misleading when applied to individual pupils because of extensive overlapping in weight and height across grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 1917 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Individual variation within age-grade groups is so large that applying group averages to individual pupils would be misleading. → Stewart 1917

Evidence

Stewart 1917

Stewart, S. F. (1917). A study of physical growth and school standing of boys. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070804

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Descriptive comparison of individual records within the freshman group. Among thirteen-year-old freshmen the heaviest boy weighed 199 pounds and the lightest 73.9 pounds against a group average of 96.9 pounds; similar overlapping of eighth-grade boys is reported.

"of the freshman boys who were thirteen years of age, the heaviest boy weighed 199* pounds while the lightest weighed 73.9 pounds. The group average was 96.9 pounds."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id group-averages-misleading-individual-overlap
title Group averages are misleading when applied to individual pupils because of extensive overlapping in weight and height across grades
description Group averages are misleading when applied to individual pupils because of extensive overlapping in weight and height across grades
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1917
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — stewart-1917

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.