Claims

Group work and discussion in the flipped classroom provided immediate feedback and supported shy students' participation, per the authors' observations

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors report that group discussion worked especially well for shy students and gave immediate feedback on understanding and misconceptions. → Maria Entezari & Mohammad Javdan 2016

Evidence

Maria Entezari & Mohammad Javdan 2016

Maria Entezari & Mohammad Javdan. (2016). Active Learning and Flipped Classroom, Hand in Hand Approach to Improve Students Learning in Human Anatomy and Physiology. International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n4p222

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' observational interpretation from the discussion section, not a separately tested result: group work and problem discussion in groups of four let shy students ask questions while the instructor circulated, providing "immediate feedback about students’ understanding and/or misconceptions". No quantitative measure supports this subclaim.

"This activity worked especially well for shy students who might be reluctant to ask their questions in class. They felt more comfortable to ask their questions or give their comments while their instructor was circulating in the class."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.