Organizing performance measures into outcomes, impacts, and processes provides rich, fair, and diagnostically useful information¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-09 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Grouping valid, reliable, and robust performance measure data into complementary groupings of student outcomes, school impacts, and processes provides rich, fair, and diagnostically useful information. → Brian Gill 2023
Evidence¶
Brian Gill 2023¶
Brian Gill, Laura Dyer. (2023). Outcomes, Impacts, and Processes: A Framework for Understanding School Performance. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/outcomes-impacts-and-processes-a-framework-for-understanding-school-performance
q1 · i? · theoretical · r?
The report's framing statement asserts that organizing performance measure data into the three complementary groupings "provides rich, fair, and diagnostically useful information." No empirical test or data analysis is reported in the available text; this is the authors' design argument.
"Organizing valid, reliable, and robust performance measure data into complementary groupings of student outcomes, school impacts on outcomes, and processes that drive those impacts provides rich, fair, and diagnostically useful information."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Defining and quantifying reliability and measurement error is particularly challenging in epistemic games for three principal reasons — related
- Developers of the principal practice instruments provided only partial information about the instruments' reliability and validity — related
- The three Pittsburgh teacher effectiveness measures are positively, moderately correlated, suggesting they are valid and complementary — related
- Psychometric reporting in character education evaluation research is inconsistent: reliability was reported for 62 of 95 scales and validity information was available for only 5 of 36 programs — related
- The Pittsburgh VAMs incorporate course-specific assessments, attendance, and course completion alongside state assessments — related
- The Early Education Essentials is sensitive to site-level differences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
grouping-outcomes-impacts-processes-yields-diagnostically-useful-information |
title |
Organizing performance measures into outcomes, impacts, and processes provides rich, fair, and diagnostically useful information |
description |
Organizing performance measures into outcomes, impacts, and processes provides rich, fair, and diagnostically useful information |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
source_checked |
2026-10-09 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — brian-gill-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.