Youth lost to attrition had discussed immigration more frequently and reported lower hope and peer validation at baseline¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Youth lost at Wave 2 reported more frequent immigration discussion, lower hope, and lower perceived peer validation at Wave 1 than retained youth, with no difference in sociopolitical efficacy or critical reflection. → Rosenbach 2022

Evidence¶

Rosenbach 2022¶

Rosenbach, S. B., Sherwood, S. H., Poteat, V. P., Yoshikawa, H., & Calzo, J. P. (2022). Benefits for Immigrant-Origin and Non-Immigrant-Origin Youth of Discussing Immigration in Gender and Sexuality Alliances. Psychology in the Schools. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22513

q3 · i? · associational · r?

Attrition analysis comparing retained versus lost participants in the two-wave GSA survey. The article prints "F (1, 475) = 11.22, p = .003" for immigration discussion frequency, plus lower hope (F = 5.87, p = .02) and lower peer validation (F = 4.81, p = .03) among lost youth; no effect sizes beyond ηp2 = .01 values are emphasized here.

"youth lost at Wave 2, compared to youth who participated at both waves, reported at Wave 1 more frequently discussing immigration, F (1, 475) = 11.22, p = .003"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Collective GSA-level immigration discussion frequency is not associated with group-level gains in any empowerment or critical consciousness outcome — related
• Immigration discussion frequency shows no significant association with critical reflection or sociopolitical efficacy — related
• More frequent immigration discussion predicts increased hope for immigrant-origin GSA members but not non-immigrant-origin members — related
• Discussing immigration more frequently than fellow GSA members predicts increased perceived peer validation by year's end — related
• Longitudinal subject attrition produces systematic baseline differences among continuing, dropout, and non-participating students — related
• Participants who dropped out of the four-wave study reported more peer victimization at the first time point than those who participated at all time points — related