Prior Nigerian studies on guided inquiry versus conventional teaching report mixed results, with one study finding the conventional method superior¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The article reports that Adebayo (2016) found students taught physics using the conventional method achieved higher than those exposed to GITM, while several other cited studies found GITM superior. → Ekomaye 2019

Evidence¶

Ekomaye 2019¶

Ekomaye, D. G. (2019). Effect of Guided Inquiry Teaching Method on Secondary School Students’ Achievement in Light and Sound Waves in Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 6(2), 82-87. doi:10.20448/journal.509.2019.62.82.87

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Narrative review of prior theses in the introduction: the article attributes to Adebayo (2016) the finding that conventional-method students achieved higher, contrasting with Ukamaka (2013), Anayo (2014), Musa (2015) and Adejo (2015) who reported GITM superiority; these are second-hand citations not re-analysed here.

"However, the results of Adebayo (2016) showed that students taught physics usin g the conventional method achieved higher than those exposed to GITM."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students taught light and sound waves with guided inquiry teaching method scored significantly higher at post-test than students taught with the conventional method — related