Claims

Publication of UK guidelines reduced variation in clozapine prescribing from 34-fold to 5-fold

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After NICE guideline publication, variation in UK prescribing rates fell from 34-fold (Purcell & Lewis, 2000) to 16-fold (Hayhurst et al., 2002) and then to 5-fold across 75 NHS mental health trusts (Downs & Zinkler, 2007). → Secchi Agostina 2025

Evidence

Secchi Agostina 2025

Secchi Agostina, Whiskey Eromona, Nair Sajitha, Shergill Sukhi, Thomas Trudy. (2025). Competence and confidence of health care professionals in using clozapine: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2025.10024

q2 · i? · review · r2

Database studies reported within the review: a county-wide audit found 34-fold variation, reduced to 16-fold after 2002 guidelines, then to 5-fold across 75 NHS trusts. The review attributes this to "increased knowledge of and confidence in the guidelines".

"Later, a study involving 75 NHS mental health trusts in England registered a further reduction of variation in prescribing rates to 5-fold (Downs & Zinkler, 2007), showing that the increased knowledge of and confidence in the guidelines helped to standardise the use of clozapine and reduced the prescribing differences in the country."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.