Claims

Computer sharing accounts for over 60% of Cognitive Tutor use in developing areas, and multi-input shared-device designs reduce cost-per-student

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review reports, citing Ogan et al. (2012), that computer sharing accounts for over 60% of use in developing areas in the Cognitive Tutor project. → Benjamin D. Nye 2015 q2 i? Multi-input shared systems such as MultiLearn+ (four users per laptop) and Single Display Groupware (whole class sharing one projection) lower hardware cost-per-student substantially. → Benjamin D. Nye 2015 (2)

Evidence

Benjamin D. Nye 2015

Benjamin D. Nye. (2015). Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports this field finding from the Cognitive Tutor project, citing Ogan et al. (2012); the underlying study's design is not described in the review. Sharing has serious implications for user models that assume each machine measures one person's work.

"Recent findings from the Cognitive Tutor project show that computer sharing accounts for over 60 % of use in developing areas, with students leaving their own machines to share a machine instead (Ogan et al. 2012)."

Benjamin D. Nye 2015 (2)

Benjamin D. Nye. (2015). Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review describes multi-input ITS field systems, citing Brunskill et al. (2010) for MultiLearn+ and Alcoholado et al. (2012) for Single Display Groupware. Neither field study indicated that students exchanged or shared input devices extensively under these conditions.

"Since inputs are inexpensive compared to processors or displays, a four-user system like MultiLearn+ lowers the cost-per-student by almost three-quarters."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id hardware-sharing-prevalent-developing-areas
title Computer sharing accounts for over 60% of Cognitive Tutor use in developing areas, and multi-input shared-device designs reduce cost-per-student
description Computer sharing accounts for over 60% of Cognitive Tutor use in developing areas, and multi-input shared-device designs reduce cost-per-student
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — benjamin-d-nye-2015, benjamin-d-nye-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.