Computer sharing accounts for over 60% of Cognitive Tutor use in developing areas, and multi-input shared-device designs reduce cost-per-student¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The review reports, citing Ogan et al. (2012), that computer sharing accounts for over 60% of use in developing areas in the Cognitive Tutor project. → Benjamin D. Nye 2015
q2 i? Multi-input shared systems such as MultiLearn+ (four users per laptop) and Single Display Groupware (whole class sharing one projection) lower hardware cost-per-student substantially. → Benjamin D. Nye 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Benjamin D. Nye 2015¶
Benjamin D. Nye. (2015). Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports this field finding from the Cognitive Tutor project, citing Ogan et al. (2012); the underlying study's design is not described in the review. Sharing has serious implications for user models that assume each machine measures one person's work.
"Recent findings from the Cognitive Tutor project show that computer sharing accounts for over 60 % of use in developing areas, with students leaving their own machines to share a machine instead (Ogan et al. 2012)."
Benjamin D. Nye 2015 (2)¶
Benjamin D. Nye. (2015). Intelligent Tutoring Systems by and for the Developing World: A Review of Trends and Approaches for Educational Technology in a Global Context. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0028-6
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review describes multi-input ITS field systems, citing Brunskill et al. (2010) for MultiLearn+ and Alcoholado et al. (2012) for Single Display Groupware. Neither field study indicated that students exchanged or shared input devices extensively under these conditions.
"Since inputs are inexpensive compared to processors or displays, a four-user system like MultiLearn+ lowers the cost-per-student by almost three-quarters."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Tutoring systems appear to be culturally dependent, per insights the paper attributes to Ogan and Johnson — related
- Help-seeking skill models built from ITS practice data were not transferable across Costa Rican, Philippine, and US contexts (reported by Ogan et al., 2014) — related
- Collaborative classroom practice in Costa Rica may explain why help-seeking models fail to transfer there — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
hardware-sharing-prevalent-developing-areas |
title |
Computer sharing accounts for over 60% of Cognitive Tutor use in developing areas, and multi-input shared-device designs reduce cost-per-student |
description |
Computer sharing accounts for over 60% of Cognitive Tutor use in developing areas, and multi-input shared-device designs reduce cost-per-student |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — benjamin-d-nye-2015, benjamin-d-nye-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.