In the Study 2 replication, the effect of the heterogeneity simulation on school-heterogeneity beliefs narrowly missed statistical significance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 The time × group interaction was not significant in Study 2. → Baier-Mosch 2026
q3 i2 The within-condition pretest-posttest change in the simulation condition was not significant but of medium effect size, narrowly missing significance. → Baier-Mosch 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Baier-Mosch 2026¶
Baier-Mosch, Franziska; Dignath, Charlotte; Kunter, Mareike (2026). Effects of heterogeneity simulations on beliefs. Learning and Instruction 101, Art. 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102258
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Study 2, an exact replication with 152 pre-service teachers, same conditions, materials and instruments. The mixed ANOVA on school-student heterogeneity beliefs showed the "interaction between time and group was not significant, F(2, 149) =2.860, p =.060, partial η2 =.037".
"The results of a mixed ANOVA showed that the interaction between time and group was not significant, F(2, 149) =2.860, p =.060, partial η2 =.037."
Baier-Mosch 2026 (2)¶
Baier-Mosch, Franziska; Dignath, Charlotte; Kunter, Mareike (2026). Effects of heterogeneity simulations on beliefs. Learning and Instruction 101, Art. 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102258
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Study 2 simple main effect in the simulation condition: "the effect of time for the heterogeneity simulation condition was not significant this time, F(1, 49) =3.968, p =.052, partial η2 =.075"; the article calls this a medium effect that only narrowly missed significance.
"A simple main effect test showed that the effect of time for the heterogeneity simulation condition was not significant this time, F(1, 49) =3.968, p =.052, partial η2 =.075."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In Study 1, a heterogeneity simulation significantly increased pre-service teachers' beliefs about the importance of responding to school students' heterogeneity — related
- Both the heterogeneity simulation and the heterogeneity text increased pre-service teachers' beliefs about responding to university students' heterogeneity in both studies — related
- Reading a scientific text on heterogeneity did not increase beliefs about responding to school students' heterogeneity, indicating self-experience is the crucial element — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
heterogeneity-simulation-school-beliefs-replication-nonsignificant |
title |
In the Study 2 replication, the effect of the heterogeneity simulation on school-heterogeneity beliefs narrowly missed statistical significance |
description |
In the Study 2 replication, the effect of the heterogeneity simulation on school-heterogeneity beliefs narrowly missed statistical significance |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
mixed |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — baier-mosch-2026, baier-mosch-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.