Heuristic-methodological instruction increases pupils' checking of answer correctness¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 87% of experimental-group pupils reported checking the correctness of answers versus 58% of control-group pupils (χ2(1)=9.935, p=0.02). → Veselinov and Nikolic 2015

Evidence¶

Veselinov and Nikolic 2015¶

Danica Veselinov, Radmila Nikolić. (2015). THE POSSIBILITIES OF ENCOURAGING STUDENT'S METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES THROUGH HEURISTIC-METHODOLOGICAL INSTRUCTION. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.06

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Chi-square analysis of the answer-checking task in the six-month quasi-experiment. The authors attribute the result to continuous checking "with their partner, group members, frontally through systematization or feedback" during the program. No effect size printed.

"Checking the correctness of the answer was the category in which a significant statistical difference existed between the two groups of studen ts, which was confirmed by the Chi-square test results (χ2(1)=9.935, on the level 0.05 р=0.02). In 87% of cases the experimental group answered that they checked the correctness of the answer, while the control group pupils did the same in 58% of cases."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Heuristic-methodological instruction changes how pupils check answers, favouring rereading and rethinking over not checking — related
• Heuristic-methodological instruction increases fourth-grade pupils' reported connecting of previously acquired knowledge with new content — related
• Heuristic-methodological instruction shows no significant effect on pupils' reported learning planning — related
• Heuristic-methodological instruction increases pupils' reported strategies for overcoming work difficulties — related