Claims

Hierarchy vocabulary exercises produced significantly higher reading comprehension than copying exercises, with a large effect size (d = 1.35)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 The hierarchy group (M = 86.67) significantly outperformed the copying group (M = 60.17) on the reading comprehension test, t(49.111) = 5.073, p < .05, with a large effect size d = 1.35. → Lin 2013

Evidence

Lin 2013

Lin, Ching-Ying & Hsu, Wei Shu. (2013). Effects of Hierarchy Vocabulary Exercises on English Vocabulary Acquisition. English Language Teaching, 6(9). doi:10.5539/elt.v6n9p110

q2 · i3 · causal · r2

Reading comprehension test (multiple-choice format) administered after the treatment with 56 Grade 5 EFL students. Independent t-test showed the hierarchy-exercise group scored significantly higher, with the article reporting "The effect size was defined as being large (d = 1.35)".

"First, the mean of the experimental group (M = 86.67, SD = 15.44) was higher than that of the control group (M = 60.17, SD = 23.13). A significant difference was found between the two groups (t (49.111) = 5.073, p < .05). The effect size was defined as being large (d = 1.35)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.