Claims

High Overall Engagement and Metacognitive-but-not-Constructive profiles show the highest immediate and delayed knowledge, with metacognitive engagement marking the key difference from lower performers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · associational r2 · q2 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i3 On immediate knowledge, High Overall Engagement scored significantly higher than Disengaged (d = 0.87) and Moderate Engagement (d = 0.98). → Yoana Omarchevska 2026 q2 i3 On delayed knowledge, High Overall Engagement significantly outperformed Low Metacognition (d = 1.11) and Moderate Engagement (d = 0.98). → Yoana Omarchevska 2026 (2) q2 i? High Overall Engagement and Metacognitive-but-not-Constructive did not differ significantly from each other, so constructive engagement was not absolutely necessary for high achievement. → Yoana Omarchevska 2026 (3)

Evidence

Yoana Omarchevska 2026

Yoana Omarchevska, Brendan A. Schuetze, Juliane Richter, Sascha Schanze, Nina Ulrich, Katharina Scheiter. (2026). From Passive to Metacognitive: The Role of Mode of Engagement in Enabling Lasting Learning Using Digital Media. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10120-z

q2 · i3 · associational · r2

Post-hoc comparisons of model-estimated standardized latent knowledge scores with Bonferroni correction (α = .005) in the immediate-knowledge SEM; effect sizes comparable to Cohen's d on the latent scale, with "d = 0.87" and "d = 0.98". The Metacognitive-but-not-Constructive profile showed the same distances.

"the High Overall Engagement immediate knowledge test was significantly higher than Disengaged (p < .005, d = 0.87) and Moderate Engagement (p < .005, d = 0.98)."

Yoana Omarchevska 2026 (2)

Yoana Omarchevska, Brendan A. Schuetze, Juliane Richter, Sascha Schanze, Nina Ulrich, Katharina Scheiter. (2026). From Passive to Metacognitive: The Role of Mode of Engagement in Enabling Lasting Learning Using Digital Media. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10120-z

q2 · i3 · associational · r2

Post-hoc comparisons on the delayed knowledge test with Bonferroni correction; the largest printed effects ("d = 1.11") distinguish the high performers from the Low Metacognition profile, whose students showed very low metacognitive engagement and focused on passive and active activities.

"the High Overall Engagement was significantly higher performing than the Low Metacognition profile ( p = .003, d = 1.11) and Moderate Engagement profiles ( p = .002, d = 0.98)"

Yoana Omarchevska 2026 (3)

Yoana Omarchevska, Brendan A. Schuetze, Juliane Richter, Sascha Schanze, Nina Ulrich, Katharina Scheiter. (2026). From Passive to Metacognitive: The Role of Mode of Engagement in Enabling Lasting Learning Using Digital Media. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10120-z

q2 · i? · associational · r2

In both immediate and delayed post-hoc comparisons the two top profiles did not differ significantly; the article interprets this via the doer effect literature, noting high amounts of engagement predict better learning. Equivalence was not formally tested.

"the High Overall Engagement and Metacognitive, but not Constructive profiles were not significantly different from one-another."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id high-engagement-metacognitive-profiles-best-outcomes
title High Overall Engagement and Metacognitive-but-not-Constructive profiles show the highest immediate and delayed knowledge, with metacognitive engagement marking the key difference from lower performers
description High Overall Engagement and Metacognitive-but-not-Constructive profiles show the highest immediate and delayed knowledge, with metacognitive engagement marking the key difference from lower performers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — yoana-omarchevska-2026, yoana-omarchevska-2026-2, yoana-omarchevska-2026-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.