Claims

Kindergarteners with a high initial handwriting level showed no learning effect on the transfer task in either the tablet-app or the traditional condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Nathalie Bonneton-Botté 2020: groups were assigned but students were analysed as independent (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-29)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? No learning effect was observed between pre- and post-test for students with a high initial level in either experimental group. → Nathalie Bonneton-Botté 2020

Evidence

Nathalie Bonneton-Botté 2020

Nathalie Bonneton-Botté, Sylvain Fleury, Nathalie Girard, Maëlys Le Magadou, Anthony Cherbonnier, Mickaël Renault, Eric Anquetil, Eric Jamet. (2020). Can Tablet Apps Support the Learning of Handwriting? An Investigation of Learning Outcomes in Kindergarten Classroom. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103831

q2 · i? · causal · r2

High-initial-level subgroup of the quasi-experiment (band 0.46 < score < .56, n = 58 printed, including 35 tablet-group students) showed no pre-to-post learning effect in either condition on the paper-and-pencil task. No effect size printed.

"No learning effect was observed for students with a high initial level in either experimental group."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.