Claims

Pre-service teachers show high intra-rater consistency between holistic and analytic grades for the same essays

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-service teachers' holistic and analytic grades for the same essays agreed highly (ICC = .849 strong essay, .902 weak essay). → Lopera-Oquendo 2024

Evidence

Lopera-Oquendo 2024

Lopera-Oquendo, C., Lipnevich, A. A., & Mañez, I. (2024). Rating writing: Comparison of holistic and analytic grading approaches in pre-service teachers. Learning and Instruction, 94, 101992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101992

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Grading task with 231 pre-service teachers who rated strong and weak essays with both approaches; intraclass correlations compared standardized holistic and analytic grades, showing "high intra-rater consistency" with ICC = .849 and .902.

"Findings showed a high intra-rater consistency among participants using holistic and analytic grades in strong (ICC = .849) and weak essays (ICC = .902)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id high-intra-rater-consistency-holistic-analytic-preservice
title Pre-service teachers show high intra-rater consistency between holistic and analytic grades for the same essays
description Pre-service teachers show high intra-rater consistency between holistic and analytic grades for the same essays
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lopera-oquendo-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.