The experimental group had the largest share of students at high levels of non-cognitive skills (80.7%), ahead of the traditional (62.1%) and control (59.3%) groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? When scores were banded into high (80%-100%), moderate (60%-79%), and low (below 60%) levels, Group A had the highest proportion of high-level performers. → Gheith and Aljaberi 2017

Evidence¶

Gheith and Aljaberi 2017¶

Eman Gheith & Nahil M. Aljaberi. (2017). The Effectiveness of an Interactive Training Program in Developing a Set of Non-Cognitive Skills in Students at University of Petra. International Education Studies, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n6p60

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive distribution of the three groups' overall scale percentages into high, moderate, and low bands (Table 2). These are descriptive percentages with no significance test reported.

"students who had a high level of non-cognitive skills were those in Group A (80.7%), followed by Group B (62.1%), and finally the control group, Group C (with a percentage of 59.3%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• An interactive training program produced statistically significant differences among three teaching methods on overall non-cognitive skills and on empathy, growth mindset and grit; post hoc tests found it beat traditional teaching, and the article does not report its comparison with a no-training control — related