High baseline word-reading performers also benefit from the embodied learning intervention in letter-sound knowledge and spelling¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 High performers in MOVE improved all letter-sounds (d = 2.0), conditional letter-sounds (d = 2.5), and spelling (d = 1.1) more than high performers in CON. → Damsgaard 2023
Evidence¶
Damsgaard 2023¶
Damsgaard, L., Nielsen, A.-M. V., Topor, M. K., Hansen, R. A., Jensen, S. K., Markers, R. L., Gejl, A. K., Malling, A. S. B., & Wienecke, J. (2023). Embodied Learning Activities Focusing on Letter-Sound Knowledge Increase Spelling Performance in 1st Grade Children with Low and High Reading Ability. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09791-9
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
Subgroup analysis of high performers (above median baseline word reading; n=25 total; MOVE n=12, CON n=13) in the RCT showed significant improvements for MOVE over CON on letter-sound naming and spelling, with the printed effect sizes d = 2.0, d = 2.5, and d = 1.1.
"For high performers, a significant difference was observed for MOVE compared to CON in all letter-sounds (p < 0.0001, mean = 3.9, 95% CI (2.4, 5.5), d = 2.0), conditional letter sounds (p < 0.0001, mean = 3.8, 95% CI (2.5, 5.0), d = 2.5) (direct training effects), and spelling performance (transfer effect) (p = 0.006, mean = 2.4, 95% CI (0.7, 4.0), d = 1.1)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Alphabet Knowledge and Print Awareness — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Low baseline word-reading performers in the embodied learning group improve letter-sound knowledge and spelling more than low performers in regular teaching — related
- A 4-week embodied learning intervention with movement-phonemes improves grade 1 children's letter-sound knowledge more than regular classroom teaching — a broader claim this one bears on
- Embodied learning gains do not differ between low and high baseline performers within the movement group — related
- Initial skills moderate embodied training effects: arm-body training harms low-skilled students on dictation and legibility, and benefits high-skilled students on dictation — related
- Eight weeks of embodied letter-sound teaching produced no transfer effect on word reading in 5–6-year-olds — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
high-performers-benefit-embodied-letter-sound-spelling |
title |
High baseline word-reading performers also benefit from the embodied learning intervention in letter-sound knowledge and spelling |
description |
High baseline word-reading performers also benefit from the embodied learning intervention in letter-sound knowledge and spelling |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — damsgaard-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.