Among elementary schools with strong 5Essentials results, high-poverty schools improved more than low-poverty schools on more than one-half of measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among elementary schools with strong 5Essentials results, high-poverty schools improved more than low-poverty schools on more than one-half of measures, suggesting greater benefit of climate improvement for student learning in high-poverty schools. → Title as printed 2021
Evidence¶
Title as printed 2021¶
Title as printed. (2021). University of Chicago Consortium on School Research press release. https://consortium.uchicago.edu
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Quantitative study of 2011–18 CPS data compared improvement among elementary schools with strong 5Essentials results, finding "high-poverty schools improved more than low-poverty schools" on more than half of measures. No effect size is printed.
"Among elementary schools with strong 5Essentials results, high-poverty schools improved more than low-poverty schools on more than one-half of measures."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Socioeconomic Status — moderator: an instructional effect differs by group
Related Claims¶
- 5Essentials Survey measures predicted school improvement in both high- and low-poverty schools at elementary and high school levels — a broader claim this one bears on
- Elementary schools strong in three or more of the five essential supports were ten times more likely to substantially improve student math and reading scores (attributed to Bryk et al., 2010) — related
- Strong scores and growth on the 5Essentials Survey predict student success measures including GPA, attendance, test scores, and college enrollment — related
- 5Essentials Survey measures predict school improvement in elementary and high schools, but not all measures relate to all outcomes — related
- Elementary GPA improved more in schools with strong 5Essentials Survey scores, a new outcome beyond the original validation — related
- Strength on most 5Essentials measures was similarly likely across poverty levels, but five measures were less prevalent in high-poverty schools — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
high-poverty-strong-schools-improved-more |
title |
Among elementary schools with strong 5Essentials results, high-poverty schools improved more than low-poverty schools on more than one-half of measures |
description |
Among elementary schools with strong 5Essentials results, high-poverty schools improved more than low-poverty schools on more than one-half of measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — title-as-printed-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.