Reinstating high-stakes testing to measure learning loss narrows the curriculum and does not benefit long-term achievement¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? High-stakes testing in service of measuring learning loss narrows the curriculum, yields few gains in transferable learning, and does not benefit students' long-term achievement. → Summer Learning and Beyond: Opportunities for Creating Equity 2021

Evidence¶

Summer Learning and Beyond: Opportunities for Creating Equity 2021¶

Summer Learning and Beyond: Opportunities for Creating Equity. (2021). Spencer Foundation & Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/summer-learning-creating-equity

q2 · i? · review · r1

Design Principle 5 section, a narrative research synthesis, asserts that "such testing narrows the curriculum" and produces few transferable gains. The report prints no specific studies or effect sizes for this claim.

"Evidence demonstrates that such testing narrows the curriculum, results in few gains to transferable learning, and does not benefit students’ long- term achievement."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Long-term outcomes showed few benefits: slight increases in upper-level math credits for low-ability students but slightly lower final GPAs and reduced 4-year college enrollment for others — related
• Overall policy effects: lowest-ability students earned more ninth-grade credits but also failed more, and long-term outcomes were small to non-existent, with no increase in college entrance — related
• Seasonality affects estimates of school effectiveness — related
• Taking Algebra I instead of remedial math increased algebra credit earning but raised failure rates and lowered grades for low- and average-ability students, with no test-score benefit — related
• Requiring all students to take college-prep ninth-grade courses did not increase dropout or reduce graduation, including for low-ability students — related
• Overall policy effects were concentrated among the lowest-ability students: larger credit gains but more failures and lower math GPAs, with ninth-grade test scores unaffected — related
• Demanding excellence for the many rather than the few is questionable, and academic excellence defined as test success is too narrow — related