Claims

High STEM educational dose is associated with roughly double the rate of STEM publications compared with low dose

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The high dose group published in STEM at nearly twice the low dose rate (11.2% vs 5.7%, gain ratio 1.972, 95% CI 1.379–2.820). → Wai 2004

Evidence

Wai 2004

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2004). Accomplishment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study (Web Supplement). https://scholar.google.com

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Combined-cohort proportion comparison for STEM publication by dose level. High dose reached 11.2% versus 5.7% for low dose, with a "1.972 (1.379, 2.820)" gain ratio; the proportion-difference CI (0.019, 0.091) excludes zero.

"STEM Publication 5.7% 11.2% (0.019, 0.091) 1.972 (1.379, 2.820)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id high-stem-dose-stem-publications
title High STEM educational dose is associated with roughly double the rate of STEM publications compared with low dose
description High STEM educational dose is associated with roughly double the rate of STEM publications compared with low dose
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2004
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wai-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.