Claims

Inducing a high-stress environment during healthcare simulation is generally associated with impaired performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 20 included studies, 11 (55%) reported impaired performance under high-stress simulation, eight (40%) reported no effect, and one (5%) reported enhanced performance. → Vage A 2024

Evidence

Vage A 2024

Vage A, Spence AD, McKeown G, Gormley GJ, Hamilton PK. (2024). Simulate to stimulate? A systematic review of stress, learning, and performance in healthcare simulation. The Ulster Medical Journal. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11591218/

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of 20 included studies (926 total participants; individual sizes 13 to 120) identified via EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE and PsycINFO searches to November 2023. The review reports "11 (55 %) detailed impaired performance". Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, so no pooled effect size is available.

"The identified studies have shown that exposure to high-stress simulation scenarios, consisting of noise, simulated patients, the presence of faculty, and increased task difficulty can elicit a variety of effects on participant performance, 11 (55 %) detailed impaired performance, eight (40 %) reported no effect on performance, and one (5 %) reported enhanced performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.