Students gave higher judgments of learning after restudy than after retrieval practice in Experiment 2 but not in Experiment 1¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Experiment 2 found significantly higher JOLs after restudy than after retrieval practice (t(122) = 5.25, p < .001, d = .33). → Luotong Hui 2021 q3 i? Experiment 1 found no difference in JOLs between the two strategies (t(62) = .78, p = .44). → Luotong Hui 2021 (2)

Evidence¶

Luotong Hui 2021¶

Luotong Hui, Anique B. H. de Bruin, Jeroen Donkers, & Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer. (2021). Does Individual Performance Feedback Increase the Use of Retrieval Practice? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09604-x

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Experiment 2 paired-samples comparison of judgments of learning after each strategy: students had "significantly higher JOLs after restudy than after retrieval practice", d = .33, consistent with fluency-based illusions after restudy.

"We found that students had significantly higher JOLs after restudy than after retrieval practice (t(122) = 5.25, p <. 0 0 1 ,d = .33)"

Luotong Hui 2021 (2)¶

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 1 paired-samples comparison found JOLs "the same across both strategies" (p = .44); no effect size printed, so the null does not establish equivalence. The authors attribute the inconsistency to the 0-to-4 response format used.

"We found that participants ’ JOLs were the same across both strategies ( t(62) = .78, p =. 4 4 ) ."

Discussion¶

JOL magnitudes decline across successive lists in both JOL groups, reflecting learners' belief that recall decreases with continued new learning — related

Page metadata

Field	Value
`type`	`claim`
`id`	`higher-jols-after-restudy-than-retrieval-practice`
`title`	`Students gave higher judgments of learning after restudy than after retrieval practice in Experiment 2 but not in Experiment 1`
`description`	`Students gave higher judgments of learning after restudy than after retrieval practice in Experiment 2 but not in Experiment 1`
`status`	`review`
`evidence_strength`	`mixed`
`newest_evidence`	`2021`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-10-21`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
`sources`	2 — `luotong-hui-2021`, `luotong-hui-2021-2`

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.