Claims

Between- or within-class homogeneous ability grouping has a small negative effect on low-ability primary students but no effect on other students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-10-16 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Between- or within-class homogeneous ability grouping had a small negative effect on low-ability students, but no effect on others. → Deunk 2018

Evidence

Deunk 2018

Deunk, M. I., Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation Practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?

Meta-analysis of studies on differentiation practices in primary education. The synthesis reports that "Between- or within-class homogeneous ability grouping had a small negative effect on low-ability students, but no effect on others"; no effect size value is printed.

"Between- or within-class homogeneous ability grouping had a small negative effect on low-ability students, but no effect on others."

Studies bearing on this claim

Does sorting learners into classes or groups by ability help them, and which learners gain or lose? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 11 narrower claims that bear on it: 6 distinct studies (3 causal, 1 quant-synthesis, 1 review, 1 associational), q2–q3, 0 of 6 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Deunk 2018 q3 · quant-synthesis · r? i? this claim
Elaine Allensworth and Takako Nomi 2014 q2 · causal · r? i? Sorting by ability affects grades and pass rates differently from test scores: high-skille (qualifies); Average test scores are higher when classes are sorted by skill, driven by large learning (qualifies); When classes are sorted by skill level, low-skilled students are at higher risk of being i (supports); How students are sorted into classrooms by skill level can affect their achievement as muc (qualifies)
Takako Nomi 2010 q3 · causal · r2 i? Tracking intensified concentration of behavioral and absentee problems in double-dose alge (supports); Algebra failure rates rose post-policy for above-norm students (~3 percentage points) but (qualifies); In one Chicago study, above-norm students' post-policy algebra test gains were partly expl (qualifies); Below-norm students' test scores improved post-policy (0.88 points total), and the relatio (qualifies); Pre-policy, classroom average ability related positively to test scores but positively to (qualifies)
Takako Nomi and Elaine M. Allensworth 2013 q3 · causal · r2 i? In one Chicago study, above-norm students' post-policy algebra test gains were partly expl (qualifies)
Hernández 2024 q2 · review · r1 i? After Hillsdale High School detracked into heterogeneous small learning communities, 100% (supports)
Douglas H. Clements 2013 q2 · associational · r? i? Differentiating curriculum for students above grade level is associated with higher math a (qualifies)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id homogeneous-ability-grouping-negative-low-ability
title Between- or within-class homogeneous ability grouping has a small negative effect on low-ability primary students but no effect on other students
description Between- or within-class homogeneous ability grouping has a small negative effect on low-ability primary students but no effect on other students
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
source_checked 2026-10-16
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — deunk-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.