Hostility and afraid attachment do not meaningfully predict cognitive flexibility, while the other variables do¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the multiple regression, all variables except hostility and afraid attachment predicted cognitive flexibility points meaningfully. → Bülent GÜNDÜZ 2013

Evidence¶

Bülent GÜNDÜZ 2013¶

Bülent GÜNDÜZ. (2013). The Contributions of Attachment Styles, Irrational Beliefs and Psychological Symptoms to the Prediction of Cognitive Flexibility. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2079-2085. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1702

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Multiple regression analysis in the 436-student study. The article reports that hostility and afraid attachment were the two variables that did not predict cognitive flexibility meaningfully; no test statistics or effect sizes are printed for this contrast.

"According to the multiple regression analysis, all of the variables except hostility and afraid attachment predict points of cognitive flexibility meaningfully"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Higher irrational beliefs, obsessive attachment and anxiety accompany lower cognitive flexibility, while negligent attachment shows an unexpected positive relationship — related
• Attachment styles, irrational beliefs and psychological symptoms jointly explain approximately 41% of the variance in university students' cognitive flexibility — a broader claim this one bears on
• Irrational beliefs, obsessive attachment and anxiety are the strongest stepwise predictors of cognitive flexibility in one correlational study of university students — a narrower finding that bears on this claim