Claims

Hot EF (CGT risk adjustment) uniquely predicts parent-rated emotional problems, while no cool EF test does

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? CGT risk adjustment accounts for an additional 10% of variance in the SDQ emotional problems scale, controlling general intellectual ability. → Poon K 2018

Evidence

Poon K 2018

Poon K (2018) Hot and Cool Executive Functions in Adolescence: Development and Contributions to Important Developmental Outcomes. Front. Psychol. 8:2311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02311

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Hierarchical regression controlling general intellectual ability predicting the five SDQ parent-version domains. The article reports CGT risk adjustment as the only EF factor associated with emotional problems, accounting for an additional 10% of variance; no cool EF test associated with any other SDQ domain.

"Only CGT risk adjustment ( B = − 0.264, t = − 3.053, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.10) accounted for an additional 10% variance in the emotional problems scale (see Table 15)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id hot-ef-predicts-emotional-problems
title Hot EF (CGT risk adjustment) uniquely predicts parent-rated emotional problems, while no cool EF test does
description Hot EF (CGT risk adjustment) uniquely predicts parent-rated emotional problems, while no cool EF test does
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — poon-k-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.