Claims

Heart rate and heart rate variability analysis is the most used physiological stress monitoring tool in surgical educational environments

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the 61 included articles, HR/HRV-based monitoring technologies were the most frequently used tools for monitoring physiological stress responses in surgical training and real interventions. → Tjønnås Maria Suong 2022

Evidence

Tjønnås Maria Suong 2022

Tjønnås Maria Suong, Guzmán-García Carmen, Sánchez-González Patricia, Gómez Enrique Javier, Oropesa Ignacio, Våpenstad Cecilie. (2022). Stress in surgical educational environments: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03841-6

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of 61 included articles retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed. The review reports that "HR-based monitoring technologies that measures HR or heart rate variability (HRV) were used to monitor stress responses in 36 articles", applied in simulation tasks and real interventions.

"HR-based monitoring technologies that measures HR or heart rate variability (HRV) were used to monitor stress responses in 36 articles"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.