Claims

Routine post-acquisition verification of HU values is uncommon and knowledge of positioning effects on CT numbers is inconsistent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Most radiographers check HU values only sometimes (37.4%), rarely (35.2%) or never (13.4%), with regular verification reported by a small minority. → Hadi Yasser H. 2026 q2 i? Understanding of whether HU values change with mis-centring was split: 39.3% answered probably yes, 23.7% might or might not, and 18.4% probably not. → Hadi Yasser H. 2026 (2)

Evidence

Hadi Yasser H. 2026

Hadi Yasser H., Bani‐Ahmad Mo'men, Moore Niamh, Clark Kevin R., Al‐Hayek Yazan, Albeshan Salman M., Alghamdi Sultan B., Precht Helle, England Andrew, McEntee Mark. (2026). Patient Centring in CT: An International Survey of Clinical Practice and Future Directions. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70119

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Survey item on routine post-acquisition HU verification among 321 radiographers; only 10.9% reported checking often and 3.1% always, which the discussion frames as a knowledge–practice gap needing targeted education.

"the most frequently selected option was ‘sometimes’ checking HU values (120, 37.4%), followed by ‘rarely’ (113, 35.2%) and ‘never’ (43, 13.4%)."

Hadi Yasser H. 2026 (2)

Hadi Yasser H., Bani‐Ahmad Mo'men, Moore Niamh, Clark Kevin R., Al‐Hayek Yazan, Albeshan Salman M., Alghamdi Sultan B., Precht Helle, England Andrew, McEntee Mark. (2026). Patient Centring in CT: An International Survey of Clinical Practice and Future Directions. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70119

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Survey item asking whether HU values change when patients are not aligned with the gantry isocentre; responses were distributed across certainty levels, with only 12.5% selecting definitely yes and 6.2% definitely not.

"‘probably yes’ was the most common response (126, 39.3%), followed by ‘might or might not’ (76, 23.7%) and ‘probably not’ (59, 18.4%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id hu-verification-uncommon-ct-number-knowledge-gaps
title Routine post-acquisition verification of HU values is uncommon and knowledge of positioning effects on CT numbers is inconsistent
description Routine post-acquisition verification of HU values is uncommon and knowledge of positioning effects on CT numbers is inconsistent
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hadi-yasser-h-2026, hadi-yasser-h-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.