Hybrid work must be reconceptualised to include the human/AI duality alongside the presence/virtual continuum¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Richter argues that adding AI to collaborative teams extends the concept of hybrid work beyond presence versus virtual work to a human/human versus human/AI duality. → Dwivedi 2023
Evidence¶
Dwivedi 2023¶
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., Carter, L., Chowdhury, S., Crick, T., Cunningham, S. W., Davies, G. H., Davison, R. M., Dé, R., Dennehy, D., Duan, Y., Dubey, R., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J. S., Flavián, C., Gauld, R., Grover, V., Hu, M.-C., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Junglas, I., Khorana, S., Kraus, S., Larsen, K. R., Latreille, P., Laumer, S., Malik, F. T., Mardani, A., Mariani, M., Mithas, S., Mogaji, E., Nord, J. H., O'Connor, S., Okumus, F., Pagani, M., Pandey, N., Papagiannidis, S., Pappas, I. O., Pathak, N., Pries-Heje, J., Raman, R., Rana, N. P., Rehm, S.-V., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Richter, A., Rowe, F., Sarker, S., Stahl, B. C., Tiwari, M. K., van der Aalst, W., Venkatesh, V., Viglia, G., Wade, M., Walton, P., Wirtz, J. and Wright, R. (2023) "So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
Conceptual argument in the hybrid-teams contribution, building on the observation that AI can assist with various team tasks and that the term hybrid work has so far been mostly limited to the presence versus virtual binary.
"Hybrid work is no longer limited to the continuum of presence and virtual but also comprehends the duality of human/human vs human/AI (cf. Fig. 1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- GenAI can foster psychologically safe team interaction while risking reduced human interaction over time — related
- AI's role in shaping interaction, epistemic agency, and shared regulation in collaborative learning remains under-theorized — related
- Excessive dependence on AI may reduce human interaction and dehumanize adult education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
hybrid-work-human-ai-duality |
title |
Hybrid work must be reconceptualised to include the human/AI duality alongside the presence/virtual continuum |
description |
Hybrid work must be reconceptualised to include the human/AI duality alongside the presence/virtual continuum |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dwivedi-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.