Hyper-reference dictionary users consulted vocabulary twice as often as paper-dictionary users, though comprehension did not differ significantly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In Aust, Kelley and Roby's Spanish study, the hyper-reference group looked up vocabulary and references per minute two times more than the paper group, while proposition recall and comprehension did not differ significantly. → Yun 2008
Evidence¶
Yun 2008¶
Yun, J. H. (2008). The Effects of Hypertext Glosses on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: A Meta-Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
The dissertation reports, citing Aust, Kelley and Roby (1993), a study of 80 fifth-semester Spanish students across four treatments, in which "the hyper-reference group consulted vocabulary and references per minute two times more" than the paper group. The mean number of propositions recalled was not statistically significant between groups.
"the hyper-reference group consulted vocabulary and references per minute two times more than the conventional paper group did regarding consultation frequency and efficiency (consultation per minute)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Earlier meta-analyses, as reported second-hand, find that glosses improve L2 vocabulary learning and that text-and-picture glosses outperform single-mode glosses — related
- Mobile language learning apps are used mainly for vocabulary learning among surveyed app users — related
- Learners resolve grammar-related noticing with intuition, reasoning, rephrasing and explicit rules rather than external resources — related
- Learners use apps mostly for vocabulary development, translation, and grammar practice, often informally and in short sessions — related
- In one 30-student study of high-school English learners (Lu 2008, reported in a review), vocabulary learned by mobile phone showed greater gains than vocabulary learned from print — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
hyper-reference-consultation-frequency-no-comprehension-gain |
title |
Hyper-reference dictionary users consulted vocabulary twice as often as paper-dictionary users, though comprehension did not differ significantly |
description |
Hyper-reference dictionary users consulted vocabulary twice as often as paper-dictionary users, though comprehension did not differ significantly |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yun-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.