Advanced technology's hyperinteractivity can intensify social inequality in education¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Based on assessments of past innovations, Annesley and Cuban suggest that hyperinteractivity enabled by advanced technology can intensify social inequality, paradoxically given its conflation with democracy. → Dennis 2020

Evidence¶

Dennis 2020¶

Dennis, J. (2020). Languaging Network Learning: The Emergence of Connectivism in Architectonic Thought. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3). https://www.irrodl.org/ doi:10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4718

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The review reports, citing Annesley (2001) and Cuban (2001), that "the hyperinteractivity that advanced technology allows can also intensify social inequality" — a caution the article attributes to those prior assessments of educational technology, not to data gathered in this article.

"Based on their assessments of past innovations, Annesley (2001) and Cuban (2001) suggested that the hyperinteractivity that advanced technology allows can also intensify social inequality."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The Republic's top-down education method contradicts Dewey's pedagogical principles and his understanding of democracy — related
• Turkish education increasingly became an exam- and success-focused selective system prioritizing elite formation, contrary to Dewey's objection to exclusion and supervision mechanisms — related
• Early self- and task-related concerns are maintained alongside later impact concerns as adoption of complex technologies advances, modifying the sequential CBAM conception — related
• Hypertextuality extends intertextuality into the digital world, foreshadowing connectivism — related
• An innovation foreign to the rest of its system tends to be rejected; lasting change needs a coordinated bundle of innovations. — related
• Contrary to claims that AI will automatically engender a more democratic, equal, and sustainable world, the editorial argues these technologies tend to exacerbate existing inequalities, environmental degradation, and labour precarity — related
• Without attention, educational innovations tend to exacerbate rather than reduce learning gaps between well-off and lower-resourced individuals — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• Frequent generative AI use enhances perceived confidence and efficiency but increases technological dependence among university students — related
• In TBLT, teachers perceive scaffolding collapse, a shortcut paradox, invisible inequity, and task realism corrosion — related