Claims

Teams from all three I3P calls functioned as PLCs at the implementation stage, with no statistically significant differences between calls across the five PLC dimensions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All PLC dimensions had means above 3 for teams from all three I3P calls, indicating the implementation stage, though values were higher for I3P-3. → Layton-Jaramillo 2025 q2 i? Differences between calls were not statistically significant for any PLC dimension, and effect sizes were low in most comparisons. → Layton-Jaramillo 2025 (2)

Evidence

Layton-Jaramillo 2025

Layton-Jaramillo, S.E., Duarte-Velasco, O.G., Aguaded-Ramírez, E.M., & Carrillo-Rosúa, F.J. (2025). Innovation in university science teaching through professional learning communities. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(1), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3115

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire survey of I3P participants (n=14, 21, and 32 for I3P-1, I3P-2, I3P-3) rated five PLC dimensions on a 1-4 scale. "All dimensions had a mean greater than 3" across calls, with I3P-3 highest.

"All dimensions had a mean greater than 3, indicating that teams from all three I3P calls are functioning as PLCs at the implementation stage; however, the values were higher for I3P-3."

Layton-Jaramillo 2025 (2)

Layton-Jaramillo, S.E., Duarte-Velasco, O.G., Aguaded-Ramírez, E.M., & Carrillo-Rosúa, F.J. (2025). Innovation in university science teaching through professional learning communities. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(1), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.3115

q2 · i? · design · r2

Mann-Whitney U tests (p<0.05) and Cohen's d compared PLC dimension scores between the three calls. "The differences between the calls are not statistically significant for any of the dimensions"; effect sizes were low in most pairwise comparisons.

"The differences between the calls are not statistically significant for any of the dimensions. However, the effect size (ES) is low across all dimensions when comparing I3P-1 with I3P-3."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id i3p-calls-plc-implementation-stage-no-significant-differences
title Teams from all three I3P calls functioned as PLCs at the implementation stage, with no statistically significant differences between calls across the five PLC dimensions
description Teams from all three I3P calls functioned as PLCs at the implementation stage, with no statistically significant differences between calls across the five PLC dimensions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2028
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — layton-jaramillo-2025, layton-jaramillo-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.