Claims

ELL students taught by IC teachers outperform ELL control students in English Language Arts by .25 (p<.001)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? ELL students taught by IC teachers significantly outperformed ELL control students in English Language Arts, outperforming their control counterparts by .25 (p<.001). → Portes 2016

Evidence

Portes 2016

Portes, P. R., Gonzalez Canche, M. S., & Stollberg, R. (2016). Early RCT Findings for ELL Elementary Student Learning Outcomes After a Two-Year Pedagogical Intervention. SREE Spring 2016 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567010

q3 · i? · causal · r2

OLS analysis of standardized CRCT ELA scores for the ELL subsample (n=766 across two cohorts; Table 7 reports 748 observations, Treatment 0.250, SE 0.070, p<.01). The article states treated ELL students "outperformed their control counterparts by .25" in English Language Arts. No standardized effect size is printed.

"In terms of coefficient magnitudes, treated ELL students outperformed their control counterparts by .25 (p. <.001) in English Language Arts."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.