Claims

In the new questionnaire, ICL and ECL correlate positively while both correlate negatively with GCL

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 In Study 1, ICL and ECL were positively correlated (r = 0.29), whereas ICL–GCL (r = −0.36) and ECL–GCL (r = −0.38) correlations were negative. → Krieglstein 2023

Evidence

Krieglstein 2023

Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Sanchez-Stockhammer, C., & Schneider, S. (2023). Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Questionnaire to Measure Different Types of Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09738-0

q2 · i2 · design · r3

Correlational analysis between the three components in the Study 1 PCA sample (n = 69). The article reports "ICL and ECL were posi- tively correlated (r = 0.29; p = 0.015)" and negative GCL correlations as printed.

"ICL and ECL were posi- tively correlated (r = 0.29; p = 0.015). In contrast, ICL and GCL (r = − 0.36; p = 0.002) as well as ECL and GCL (r = − 0.38; p = 0.002) were negatively correlated."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id icl-ecl-positive-gcl-negative-correlations
title In the new questionnaire, ICL and ECL correlate positively while both correlate negatively with GCL
description In the new questionnaire, ICL and ECL correlate positively while both correlate negatively with GCL
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — krieglstein-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.