Claims

The iCub storytelling system achieved 88% trial success and 86% VLM sticker-description agreement, with the LLM adding to human contributions in 8% of trials and never correcting them

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across the validation trials the system was robust with an 88% success rate despite failures such as wrong sticker detection, microphone issues and LLM crashes. → Maria Lombardi 2025 q3 i? Zero-shot VLM sticker descriptions agreed with the participant's chosen image in 86% of cases, and the LLM added a small contribution to the human's story piece in 8% of trials while never correcting or polishing it. → Maria Lombardi 2025 (2)

Evidence

Maria Lombardi 2025

Maria Lombardi, Carmela Calabrese, Davide Ghiglino, Caterina Foglino, Davide De Tommaso, Giulia Da Lisca, Lorenzo Natale, Agnieszka Wykowska. (2025). Would you let a humanoid play storytelling with your child? A usability study on LLM-powered narrative Human-Robot Interaction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02505 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.02505

q3 · i? · design · r2

Quantitative failure analysis of the validation experiment, logging FSM transitions and trial success across the many interacting modules. The article reports an overall 88% success rate; the 12% failed tests are analysed in the Limitations section.

"Our system was pretty robust with 88% success rate."

Maria Lombardi 2025 (2)

Maria Lombardi, Carmela Calabrese, Davide Ghiglino, Caterina Foglino, Davide De Tommaso, Giulia Da Lisca, Lorenzo Natale, Agnieszka Wykowska. (2025). Would you let a humanoid play storytelling with your child? A usability study on LLM-powered narrative Human-Robot Interaction. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02505

q3 · i? · design · r2

VLM detection evaluation computed as agreement between the LLM's sticker description and the image chosen by the participant, yielding 86% overall agreement. A separate LLM-generation analysis found additions in 8% of trials and no corrections of the human's contribution.

"The overall agreement was 86%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id icub-storytelling-system-success-rates
title The iCub storytelling system achieved 88% trial success and 86% VLM sticker-description agreement, with the LLM adding to human contributions in 8% of trials and never correcting them
description The iCub storytelling system achieved 88% trial success and 86% VLM sticker-description agreement, with the LLM adding to human contributions in 8% of trials and never correcting them
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
recheck_by 2028
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — maria-lombardi-2025, maria-lombardi-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.