First- and second-year Idaho charter students show growth not statistically different from their TPS VCRs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2022: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Idaho charter school students' learning growth in the first and second year of charter attendance is not statistically different from that of VCR students in traditional public schools. → CREDO 2019
Evidence¶
CREDO 2019¶
CREDO, Center for Research on Education Outcomes, Stanford University. (2019). Charter School Performance in Idaho. https://credo.stanford.edu
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Subset analysis limited to students first enrolling in a charter school between the 2015-16 and 2016-17 school years and their VCRs (4,016 reading and 4,005 math student observations). Growth in both the first and second year is not statistically different from TPS VCR growth.
"Idaho charter school students experience learning growth in the first and the second year of charter attendance that is not statistically different from that of students (VCR) enrolled in traditional public school settings."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- About 41 percent of Idaho charter schools significantly outperform their traditional schooling alternatives in both reading and math — related
- Charter students' learning growth in the first, second, and third year of enrollment is not statistically different from TPS peers — a broader claim this one bears on
- Idaho charter reading advantage appears only in the 2016-2017 growth period, not in 2015-2016 — related
- New Mexico charter students' reading advantage emerges in the third year of enrollment, while math growth does not differ by years enrolled — related
- Charter learning gains in each of the three growth periods do not differ statistically from TPS peers — related
- Charter students' math disadvantage is concentrated in the first two growth periods, with performance similar to VCR peers by 2016-2017 — reports the opposite
- Idaho charter school students show stronger reading growth than matched TPS peers, with no significant difference in math growth — reports the opposite
- Idaho online charter students show weaker math growth than TPS VCRs and lag brick-and-mortar charter students in both subjects — related
- No cohort-by-years-of-enrollment configuration shows statistically different learning gains from TPS — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
idaho-charter-years-of-enrollment-null |
title |
First- and second-year Idaho charter students show growth not statistically different from their TPS VCRs |
description |
First- and second-year Idaho charter students show growth not statistically different from their TPS VCRs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
recheck_by |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — credo-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.