Design of learning activities and measurement/evaluation load highest among knowledge and ability components; systematic thinking highest among personal attributes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Within the Ability dimension, design of learning activities (A4 = 0.901) and measurement and evaluation of learning outcomes (A6 = 0.821) showed the highest loadings; within Personal Attributes, systematic thinking (C3 = 0.892) and teamwork (C2 = 0.803) were highest. → Khaewphuang 2025

Evidence¶

Khaewphuang 2025¶

Khaewphuang, P., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2025). Components and Indicators of Instructional Design Competence for Thai Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(2), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v6i2.97

q2 · i? · associational · r2

First-order CFA of 17 variables from the questionnaire of 471 pre-service teachers; the article reports loadings "ranging from 0.716 to 0.901, all statistically significant at the .01 level," with the component-level maxima quoted here.

"In the Ability in Instructional Design dimension (A), the highest loading was observed for the design of learning activities (A4) at 0.901, followed by the measurement and evaluation of learning outcomes (A6) at 0.821. In the Personal Attributes dimension (C), the variable with the highest loading was systematic thinking (C3) at 0.892, followed by teamwork (C2) at 0.803."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Ability in instructional design carries the highest second-order factor loading, followed by knowledge and personal attributes — related
• Instructional design competence of pre-service teachers comprises knowledge, ability, and personal attributes dimensions — a broader claim this one bears on
• The three-dimension instructional design competence model fits the empirical data acceptably in CFA — related